•  
  •  
 

Publication Date

2001

Abstract

Offers a response to Nobes' comment on Zaid [2000]. Fo­cuses on Nobes' interpretation of the arguments presented by Zaid, his contentions about pious inscriptions' and the use of the term journal'. Calls for broader thinking on the history of double entry bookkeeping and for more research on possible antecedents in the Islamic state.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.