Honors Theses

Date of Award

2017

Document Type

Undergraduate Thesis

Department

Teacher Education

First Advisor

Rosemary Oliphant-Ingham

Relational Format

Dissertation/Thesis

Abstract

This literature review examines sources of incoherency——both macrocosmic and microcosmic——that impact the goal of establishing a coherent high school literature curriculum. Macrocosmic sources of incoherency involve the institutions through which standards and curriculum are constructed while microcosmic sources concern issues within the discipline of English. Among the macrocosmic/institutional sources of incoherency are an unclear division of power between federal and state government, the lack of a professional vocabulary in education, competing interpretations of standards and reforms, and a lack of educational infrastructure. Microcosmic/disciplinary sources include competing ideologies within English education as well as the weakening of the classical, ethical, and nonacademic teaching traditions of English; the distortion of New Criticism and reader response theory also account as a source of microcosmic/ disciplinary coherency. Each of the sources are discussed at length, drawing from a range of sources by influential scholars in English education. The literature review concludes with three suggestions for administrators, educators, and policymakers to bridge the gap between theory and practice.

Accessibility Status

Searchable text

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.