Date of Award
Public Policy Leadership
From 2017 to 2020, the Trump administration cut United States refugee admissions tenfold. These reforms come unprecedented to the 40-year-old resettlement program (USRAP). By critically reviewing literature on this topic as well as conducting eight original interviews with five national nonprofits contracted by the Department of State to do refugee resettlement casework, this study sought to identify the implications of the Trump administration’s reforms to the program. Once implications were identified, I used the applied frameworks of program model as well as Michael Worth’s sociological and political science theories of American nonprofit-government relations to better inform and guide the study. Worth’s theories illustrate that nonprofits complement American traditions such as freedom, representation, and diversity, making them play an important role in democracy. This study found that refugee resettlement services affirm that theory. Compiling the significance of the reforms’ implications against the test of a robust theoretical framework led to an understanding that the Trump administration’s cuts to the USRAP indeed reduces the nonprofits’ ability to fulfill their role in government. These reforms will forever weigh heavy in the history of the program.
Day, Savannah, "“[Don’t] Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor...” a Study on the Trump Administration’s Unprecedented Reforms to the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program and their Implications" (2020). Honors Theses. 1341.
American Politics Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Immigration Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, International Relations Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Public Policy Commons, Social Work Commons