Publication Date
2001
Abstract
Offers a response to Nobes' comment on Zaid [2000]. FoÂÂcuses on Nobes' interpretation of the arguments presented by Zaid, his contentions about pious inscriptions' and the use of the term journal'. Calls for broader thinking on the history of double entry bookkeeping and for more research on possible antecedents in the Islamic state.
Recommended Citation
Zaid, Omar Abdullah
(2001)
"Were Islamic records precursors to accounting books based on the Italian method? A response,"
Accounting Historians Journal: Vol. 28:
Iss.
2, Article 9.
Available at:
https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aah_journal/vol28/iss2/9