-
Attest engagements on greenhouse gas emissions information; Statement of Position, 13-1
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Sustainability Task Force
-
Performing agreed-upon procedures engagements that address the completeness, mapping, consistency, or structure of XBRL-formatted information; Statement of Position, 13-2
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. XBRL Assurance Task Force
-
Reporting pursuant to the Global Investment Performance Standards; Statement of position, 12-1
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Comment Letters on Proposed Statement on Auditing Standards: Consideration of laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statements
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Proposed Statement on Auditing Standards: Consideration of fraud in a Financial Statement Audit (Redrafted
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Proposed Statement on Auditing Standards: Consideration of fraud in a Financial Statement Audit (Redrafted); Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants) 2009, January 28
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Proposed Statement on Auditing Standards: Consideration of laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statements; Exposure Draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants) 2009, January 30
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Performing agreed-upon procedures engagements that address the completeness, accuracy, or consistency of XBRL-tagged data; Statement of position 09-1
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. XBRL Assurance Task Force
-
Proposed audit and accounting guide: gaming; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2008, September 10
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Accounting Standards Executive Committee
-
Audit documentation: supplementary material; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2008, April 30
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Auditor's communication with those charged with governance: supplementary material;
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Changes made to the December 2007 exposure draft (ED) of International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 402 (revised and redrafted), audit considerations relating to an entity using a third party service organization, and proposed statement on auditing standards (SAS) audit considerations relating to an entity using a service organization; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2008, November 17
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Disposition of paragraphs in AU section 324, servce organizations, in the proposed statement on auditing standards (SAS), Audit considerations when an entity uses a service organization, and in the proposed statement on standards for attestation engagements(SSAE), reporting on controls at a service organization; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2008, November 17
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Proposed preface to codification of statements on auditing standards: principles governing an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, and Proposed statement on auditing standards: overall objectives of the independent auditor and the conduct of an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2008, September 26
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Proposed statement on auditing standards: audit considerations relating to an entity using a service organization (redrafted); Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2008, November 17
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Proposed statement on auditing standards: Communicating internal control related matters in an audit; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2008, June 12
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Proposed statement on auditing standards: compliance audits; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2008, December 24
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Proposed statement on auditing standards: interim financial information (amends AU section 722, interim financial information); Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2008, September 2
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Proposed statement on auditing standards no. 103 (redrafted): Audit documentation; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2008, April 30
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Proposed statement on auditing standards no. 114 (redrafted): the auditor's communication with those charged with governance; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2008, April 30
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Proposed statement on auditing standards: performing audit procedures in response to assessed risks and evaluating the audit evidence obtained; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2008
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Proposed statement on standards for attestation engagements: an examination of an entity's internal control over financial reporting that is integrated with an audit of its financial statements; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2008, June 12
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Proposed statement on standards for attestation engagements: reporting on controls at a service organization; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2008, November 17
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Supplementary material: proposed statement on auditing standards: overall objectives of the independent auditor and the conduct of an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2008, September 26
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Proposed Content and skill specifications for the uniform CPA examination; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2008
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Board of Examiners
-
Proposed statements on standards for tax services; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2008, November 26
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Tax Executive Committee
-
Comment letters on Omnibus Statement on Standards for Accounting and Review Services
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Accounting and Review Services Committee
-
Proposed statement on standards for Accounting and review services : Defining professional requirements in statements on standards for accounting and review services;Defining professional requirements in statements on standards for accounting and review services; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2007, Aug. 22
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Accounting and Review Services Committee
The proposed SSARS defines two categories of professional requirements: (1) Unconditional requirements. The accountant is required to comply with an unconditional requirement in all cases in which the circumstances exist to which the requirement applies. An unconditional requirement is indicated by the words must or is required. (2) Presumptively mandatory requirements. The accountant is also required to comply with a presumptively mandatory requirement in all cases in which the circumstances exist to which the requirement applies. The accountant may depart from a presumptively mandatory requirement provided that he or she justifies the departure and how alternative procedure(s) performed in the circumstances were sufficient to achieve the objectives of the requirement. The word should indicates a presumptively mandatory requirement.
-
Proposed statement on standards for accounting and review services: Omnibus statement on standards for accounting and review services - 2008; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2007, October 9
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Accounting and Review Services Committee
-
Proposed AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide : Airlines;Airlines; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2007, Sept. 12
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Accounting Standards Executive Committee and American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Airline Guide Task Force
This guide does the following: (1) Identifies certain requirements set forth in pronouncements in levels a, b, and c of the hierarchy of sources of GAAP. In these instances, entities are required to apply those requirements based on their standing in levels a, b, or c of the hierarchy rather than because of their inclusion in this guide. (2) Describes AcSEC’s understanding of prevalent or sole industry practice concerning certain issues. In addition, this guide may indicate that AcSEC expresses a preference for the prevalent or sole industry practice, or it may indicate that AcSEC expresses a preference for another practice that is not the prevalent or sole industry practice; alternatively, AcSEC may express no view on the matter. (3) Identifies certain other, but not necessarily all, industry practices concerning certain accounting issues without expressing AcSEC’s views on them Provides guidance that has been supported by AcSEC on the accounting, reporting, or disclosure treatment of transactions or events that is not set forth in pronouncements in levels a, b, and c of the hierarchy of sources of GAAP.
-
Attestation engagements that address specified compliance control objectives and related controls at entities that provide services to investment companies, investment advisers, or other service providers; Statement of position 07-2
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Clarification of the scope of the audit and accounting guide investment companies and accounting by parent companies and equity method investor for investments in investment companies; Statement of position 07-1
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Proposed statement on auditing standards: understanding the entity and its environment and assessing the risks of material misstatement; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2007
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
-
Proposed revisions to the AICPA standards for performing and reporting on peer reviews; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2007, April 16
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Peer Review Board
The most significant conclusions to come from the work of the above task forces were (1) a recommendation to merge the two peer review programs and (2) a recommendation to reengineer the reporting process to be more understandable and usable in light of the growing mandate that the results of peer reviews be made more widely available. The PRB has issued this exposure draft to propose those recommendations and incorporate other revisions to the Standards and related Interpretations (AICPA Professional Standards, PR Section 100) that are expected to result in a more efficient and effective Program. To ensure Program integrity and usefulness, the PRB designed the proposed revisions to meet stakeholders’ needs. The revisions recognize the importance peer review plays in the state board of accountancy licensure process. Approximately 40 state boards require peer review, as do other regulators such as the Government Accountability Office. The PRB strongly believes that the proposed revisions will improve peer review execution and rigor. Also, a new reporting model designed to meet the needs of reviewed firms and other stakeholders will enhance peer review report clarity, comparability and understandability.
-
Proposal of Professional Ethics Division: Proposed interpretation 501-8 under rule 501: "Failure to follow requirements of governmental bodies, commissions, or other regulatory agencies on indemnication and limitation of liability agreements with a client"; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2007, December 3
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Professional Edthics Executive Committee
-
Proposal of Professional Ethics Division; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2007, Aug. 13
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Professional Ethics Executive Committee
Proposed revision of ET section 92: Definintion of Firm; Proposed addition to ET section 92: Definition of network; Proposed interpretation of 101-17, , Networks and Network Firms
-
Proposal of Professional Ethics Division: Proposed interpretation 102-7, other considerations: meeting the objectives of the fundamental principles, and proposed framework for meeting the objectives of the fundamental principles;Proposed interpretation 102-7, other considerations: meeting the objectives of the fundamental principles, and proposed framework for meeting the objectives of the fundamental principles; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2007, May 15
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Professional Ethics Executive Committee
The Committee recognizes that specific threats to meeting the objectives of the fundamental principles may arise when providing professional services to clients and employers. Because it is impossible to address in the Code every situation that creates such threats and specify the appropriate safeguards to mitigate or eliminate those threats, the proposed Framework provides guidance to members when faced with making decisions on ethical matters that are not explicitly addressed by the Code. Under no circumstances, however, may the proposed Framework be used to justify noncompliance with the prohibitions or requirements contained in the rules, interpretations, and rulings in the Code. In cases where a member identifies a threat that is not clearly insignificant (that is, it is more than trivial and inconsequential), the member is required to apply safeguards to eliminate the threat or reduce it to an acceptable level. If a threat cannot be sufficiently mitigated through the application of safeguards, or if a member is unable to implement appropriate safeguards, the member should decline or discontinue the specific professional service. Because the nature of the threats and safeguards may differ for members in public practice and members not in public practice, the proposed Framework provides specific examples relevant to members in public practice and members who are not in public practice. In addition, the proposed Framework contains guidance on ethical conflict resolution that is relevant to all members.
-
Proposed revisions to AICPA/NASBA Uniform Accountancy Act sections 23, 7 and 14; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2007, March
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. UAACommittee; National Association of State Boards of Accountancy. UAA Committee
-
Proposed statement on standards for accounting and review services : Elimination of certain references to statements on auditing standards and incorporation of appropriate guidance into statements on standards for accounting and review services;Elimination of certain references to statements on auditing standards and incorporation of appropriate guidance into statements on standards for accounting and review services; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2006, Dec. 1
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Accounting and Review Services Committee
The proposed Statement would amend AR sections 100, 200, 300, and 400. In addition, the following Interpretations are anticipated to be affected: Withdraw Interpretation No. 4, “Discovery of Information After the Date of the Accountant’s Report,†of AR section 100. Amend Interpretation No. 11, “Reporting on Uncertainties†by eliminating the reference to SAS No. 59, The Auditor’s Consideration of an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern and incorporating guidance specific to compilation and review engagements. Conform Interpretation No. 15, “Differentiating a Financial Statement Presentation From a Trial Balance,†of AR section 100 by deleting the “typical titles†for financial statements and instead referencing the examples of financial statement titles included in AR section 100.04 as revised by the proposed Statement.
-
Proposed statement on standards for accounting and review services: Elimination of certain references to statements on auditing standards and incorporation of appropriate guidance into statements on standards for accounting and review services; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2006, December 1
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Accounting and Review Services Committee
-
Proposed statement on auditing standards : Omnibus--2006;Omnibus--2006 ; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2006, July 25
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
1. The proposed SAS Omnibus will amend the general and reporting standards that were not amended by SAS No. 105. The proposed SAS Omnibus will also amend those SASs that quote the 10 standards to conform them with the changes in SAS No. 105 and to the changes proposed in this Statement. 2. The proposed amendment to SAS No. 99, Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit, adds a footnote to SAS No. 99 that provides a clear link between the auditor’s consideration of fraud and the auditor’s assessment of risk and the auditor’s procedures in response to those assessed risks. 3. The amendments in this exposure draft are necessary to remove references to the completion of fieldwork . 4. The date of management’s representation letter is changed to align it with the requirement in SAS No. 103 that the auditor’s report not be dated prior to the date on which the auditor has obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
-
Proposed statement on auditing standards : The auditor's communication with those charged with governance;Auditor's communication with those charged with governance; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2006, March 10
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
This exposure draft introduces a proposed Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) that will replace SAS No. 61, Communication With Audit Committees, as amended. This proposed SAS establishes standards and provides guidance to an auditor on matters to be communicated with those charged with governance.
-
Proposed statement on quality control standards : A Firm's system of quality control;Firm's system of quality control; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2006, July 28
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
The proposed SQCS defines the engagement quality control review (often referred to as a concurring review), and requires firms to establish criteria to determine which engagements are to be subject to an engagement quality control review. It also provides guidance on policies and procedures for performing engagement quality control reviews. An engagement quality control review should include a review of the financial statements or other subject matter information and the report, and, in particular, consideration of whether the report is appropriate. An engagement quality control review also should include either (i) a discussion with the practitioner-in-charge, (ii) a review of selected working papers relating to the significant judgments the engagement team made and the conclusions they reached, or (iii) both discussion and review. The decision to review selected working papers in addition to, or instead of, discussion with the practitioner-incharge depends on the complexity of the engagement and the risk that the report might not be appropriate in the circumstances.
-
Proposed statement on standards for attestation engagements: Reporting on an entity’s internal control over financial reporting (To supersede Chapter 5, “Reporting on an Entity’s Internal Control Over Financial Reporting,†of Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 10, Attestation Standards: Revision and Recodification, as amended);Reporting on an entity’s internal control over financial reporting; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2006, Jan. 19
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
This Statement establishes standards and provides guidance to a practitioner reporting on an entity's internal control over financial reporting (or on an assertion thereon)1,2 as of a point in time or for a period.3 Guidance is provided on examining: a. The design and operating effectiveness of an entity's internal control. b. The design and operating effectiveness of the internal control of a component of an entity, for example, an operating division of an entity or its accounts receivable function. (See paragraph 247.) c. The effectiveness of the design of an entity's internal control, including internal control that has not yet been placed in operation. (In such engagements, management makes no assertion about the operating effectiveness of internal control.) (See paragraphs 248 through 254.)4 d. The design and operating effectiveness of an entity's internal control based on criteria established by a regulatory agency. (See paragraphs 255 through 259.)
-
Proposed statement on standards of attestation engagements : SSAE hierarchy;SSAE hierarchy; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2006, July 25
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Auditing Standards Board
The proposed SSAE: 1. Identifies the body of attest literature. 2. Clarifies the authority of attest publications issued by the AICPA and others. 3. Specifies which attest publications the practitioner must comply with and those he or she should be aware of when conducting an attest engagement. 4. Amends the 11 attestation standards to conform them with the use of terms established in SSAE No. 13, Defining Professional Requirements in Statements on Standards for Attestation Engagements.
-
Proposed statement on standards for valuation services: Valuation of a business, business ownership interest, security, or intangible asset; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2006,October 16
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Consulting Services Executive Committee
-
Reporting pursuant to the Global Investment Performance Standards; Statement of position 06-1;
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Investment Performance Standards Task Force
-
Omnibus proposal of Professional Ethics Division interpretations and rulings; Exposure draft (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 2006, Sept. 8
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Professional Ethics Executive Committee
Consistent with the original proposal issued in September 2005, the proposed interpretation states that independence would not be impaired if a member and the client agree that the unsuccessful party in a lawsuit or alternative dispute resolution (ADR) proceeding between them will pay the legal fees and expenses of the successful party. The proposed interpretation retains the conclusion that an indemnification or limitation of liability provision related to nonattest services performed for an attest client (that is, where the provision relates only to the nonattest services engagement and not the attest engagement) would not impair a member’s independence with respect to that client.