Honors Theses

Date of Award

2008

Document Type

Undergraduate Thesis

Department

Political Science

First Advisor

Charles Ross

Relational Format

Dissertation/Thesis

Abstract

This thesis considers the current format of the postseason for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I-Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS), critiques its ethical implications, and proposes a twelve-team postseason playoff to remedy the ethical dilemmas caused by the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) and the commercialization of football at the Division I-FBS level. Research was focused on sports law journals, books detailing the history of college football, transcripts from Congressional hearings, and articles from prominent sports news sources. The first chapter outlines the evolution of college football since the advent of television as mass media and highlights the medium’s direct effects on the administration of the sport. The second chapter details the BCS and its implementation. The third chapter calls into question the ethics of universities using football as a revenue generator without naming a NCAA champion as is done in every other sport and the lower divisions of college football. The fourth chapter lays the framework for a postseason playoff system and addresses how it resolves the conflicts of interest presented by the BCS.

Accessibility Status

Searchable text

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.