Honors Theses
Date of Award
Spring 5-13-2023
Document Type
Undergraduate Thesis
Department
Croft Institute for International Studies
First Advisor
Antonia Eliason
Second Advisor
Joshua Hendrickson
Third Advisor
Oliver Dinius
Relational Format
Dissertation/Thesis
Abstract
This changing nature of the Chinese government’s ideology leads one to believe that its core beliefs are not dogmatic, despite the foundation for their ideology being rooted in specific societal and economic theories. Starting with Mao Zedong to modern day, the Chinese government officials will continue to support the original tenets (and, no doubt, future presidents’ additions to the tenets). However, the interpretation of their ideology over time is fluid and is used to support policies and actions during a political cycle. Chinese political leaders are unlikely to disagree with a past leaders, and will rather use their own interpretation of their predecessors’ ideologies and rhetoric to move China forward.
This thesis proposes that during a Chinese leader’s time in office, their government rhetoric, more specifically political speeches, can be contradictory regarding policies and previous beliefs of past leaders. The content of speeches given by different Chinese government officials often contradict each other. At separate times, the speakers for the Chinese government maintain their support of the original tenets of Marxism, socialism, and later Maoism, but add their own theories for China’s progress, showing evolution of these tenets away from their original intended meaning.
Recommended Citation
Paredes, Israel, "Chinese Political Rhetoric and Ideology: Tension and Pretension" (2023). Honors Theses. 3016.
https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/3016
Accessibility Status
Searchable text
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Included in
Chinese Studies Commons, Economic History Commons, Economic Policy Commons, Economic Theory Commons, Growth and Development Commons, International Economics Commons, Macroeconomics Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Policy History, Theory, and Methods Commons, Political Economy Commons, Public Administration Commons