Honors Theses

Date of Award

2015

Document Type

Undergraduate Thesis

Department

Economics

First Advisor

Mark Van Boening

Relational Format

Dissertation/Thesis

Abstract

End-of-life care is a sensitive subject because it deals with life and death, as well as dealing with the nature of that death. In its most basic form, end-of-life care can be divided into two distinct pathways: aggressive treatment and methods, or palliative treatment and care. This paper explores the history surrounding these two routes and the implications that surround them. A review of the literature reveals that in many cases palliative care can increase in quality-of-life. An important part of the decision between aggressive and palliative care are the patient's and the doctor's feelings towards certain aspects of end-of-life care. This paper incorporates the literature into a game theoretic model of the doctor/patient relationship at the end of life. Seven different scenarios are analyzed which illuminate the influence that factors like patient respect for the doctor and counseling can have on what type of care is realized for the patient. In particular, the model implies that patients who undergo end-of-life counseling and create advanced directives are more inclined to undergo palliative care and have generally better outcomes than those who do not. This paper calls for an increase in the awareness about the benefits of counseling and advanced directives so that patients may make the best decisions possible regarding their quality-of-life when faced with end-of-life care choices. 

Accessibility Status

Searchable text

Included in

Economics Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.