Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-1-2022
Abstract
Given the uncertainty regarding auditors' responsibilities, standard setters considered the need for clarification of technical terms such as reasonable assurance in the new audit reporting models. The PCAOB ultimately decided to exclude clarifying language from its final standard, while the Auditing Standards Board and IAASB made such language mandatory. Given the difference in reporting models, this study investigates the role clarification of reasonable assurance plays in auditor negligence. We predict and find that, absent clarification, jurors judge auditors to be more negligent when the audit report includes a related critical audit matters disclosure than when it does not. However, consistent with our prediction, clarifying what is meant by reasonable assurance mitigates this increase in auditors' liability exposure by reducing jurors' perceptions of auditors' personal control over the misstatement at the time of the audit. Thus, our evidence suggests that the PCAOB's decision to not include such language in the new audit reporting model may have been shortsighted given the potential for clarification to mitigate a potential negative unintended consequence to auditors' litigation exposure under the new audit reporting model.
Relational Format
journal article
Recommended Citation
Backof, A. G., Bowlin, K., & Goodson, B. M. (2022). The importance of clarification of auditors’ responsibilities under the new audit reporting standards*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 39(4), 2284–2304. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12802
DOI
10.1111/1911-3846.12802
Accessibility Status
Searchable text