Conceptual Framework and Case Studies for Audit Planning and Evaluation Given the Potential for Fraud; Discussant Comments on A Conceptual Framework and Case Studies for Audit Planning and Evaluation Given the Potential for Fraud

Authors

Jerry L. Turner
Theodore J. Mock
Rajendra P. Srivastava
Ray Whittington

Files

Language

English

Publication Date

2002

Publisher

University of Kansas. School of Business

Identifier

Pages from auditing symposium xvi 2002-6

Relational Format

pamphlet

Keywords

Forensic accounting; Fraud

Disciplines

Accounting

Comments

Unless otherwise indicated herein, these contents have not been copyrighted, and permission is hereby granted to reproduce or quote from material included herein in whole or in part, provided that full credit is given to 1) the author of the material and 2) this source: Auditing Symposium XVI; Proceedings of the 2002 Deloitte & Touche/ University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems

Accessibility Status

Searchable text

Source

Proceedings of the 2002 Auditing Symposium XVI: Deloitte & Touche/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems

Recommended Citation

Turner, Jerry L.; Mock, Theodore J.; Srivastava, Rajendra P.; and Whittington, Ray, "Conceptual Framework and Case Studies for Audit Planning and Evaluation Given the Potential for Fraud; Discussant Comments on A Conceptual Framework and Case Studies for Audit Planning and Evaluation Given the Potential for Fraud" (2002). Proceedings of the University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems. 221.
https://egrove.olemiss.edu/dl_proceedings/221