Proceedings of the University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems
The Deloitte/University of Kansas Auditing Symposium has been held on a bi-annual basis since 1972. Its purpose is to provide a forum where practitioners, regulators, and academics can come together and have open discussions about the auditing profession from each of their unique perspectives. It is seen as a greatly beneficial event for practitioners, regulators, and academics alike. Information about current symposia can be found at the University of Kansas School of Business.
-
Principles-based versus Rules-based Accounting Standards: The Influence of Standard Precision and Audit Committee Strength on Financial Reporting Decisions
Christopher P. Agoglia, Timothy S. Doupnik, and George T. Tsakumis
-
Standard Setters Panel Discussion: How Management and Auditors Should Be Making and Evaluating Judgments
Martin Baumann, John Fogarty, Phil Wedemeyer, and Roger Martin
-
Center for Audit Quality Panel Discussion: What We Observe Happening in the New Environment
William Ezzell, Randy Fletchall, and Cindy Fornelli
-
When Is Trusted Advice Not Trustworthy? How Affiliation and Advice Quality Influence Auditors’ Evaluation and Use of Advice
Kathryn Kadous, Justin Leiby, and Mark E. Peecher
-
Audit Committee Members’ and Managers’ Financial Incentives and the Materiality of Financial Statement Misstatements
Marsha B. Keune and Karla M. Johnstone
-
Impact of Principles-Versus Rules-Based Accounting Standards on Auditors’ Motivations and Judgments
Marietta Peytcheva and Arnold M. Wright
-
Audit Partners Panel Discussion: How Are We Dealing with the Increased Level of Judgment?
Hal Zeidman, Brian Richson, Leroy Dennis, and Bill Messier
-
Deductive Method of Fraud Detection; Discussant Comments for The Deductive Method of Fraud Detection
Conan C. Albrecht, W. Steve Albrecht, and J. Gregory Dunn1
-
Auditor Industry Specialization and Fraudulent Financial Reporting; Discussant’s Response: “Auditor Industry Specialization and Fraudulent Financial Reporting”
Joseph V. Carcello, Albert L. Nagy, and Audrey A. Gramling
-
Proceedings of the 2002 Auditing Symposium XVI: Deloitte & Touche/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems
James A. Heintz, University of Kansas. School of Business, and Deloitte & Touche
-
Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Some Evidence from Restatements; Discussant Comments for Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Some Evidence from Restatements
Zoe-Vonna Palmrose, Susan Scholz, and Timothy Bell
-
Conceptual Framework and Case Studies for Audit Planning and Evaluation Given the Potential for Fraud; Discussant Comments on A Conceptual Framework and Case Studies for Audit Planning and Evaluation Given the Potential for Fraud
Jerry L. Turner, Theodore J. Mock, Rajendra P. Srivastava, and Ray Whittington
-
Audit Policy Implications of Academic Research on Fraudulent Financial Reporting; Comments on Academic Research and Auditors’ Detection of Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Audit Policy Implications
T. Jeffrey Wilks, Mark F. Zimbelman, Selvoy J. Boyer, and William F. Messier Jr.
-
Model of errors and irregularities as a general framework for risk-based audit planning
Jere R. Francis and Richard A. Grimlund
-
Framing effects and output interference in a concurring partner review context: Theory and exploratory analysis
Karla M. Johnstone, Stanley F. Biggs, and Jean C. Bedard
