Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Date of Award

1-1-2025

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Ph.D. in Engineering Science

First Advisor

Jacob J. Najjar

Second Advisor

Christopher C. Mullen

Third Advisor

Amir A. Mehrara Molan

School

University of Mississippi

Relational Format

dissertation/thesis

Abstract

Natural disasters such as floods and earthquakes pose significant threats to the resilience of highway transportation systems, particularly compromising the safety and serviceability of bridges. In regions susceptible to both seismic activity and flooding, the combined effects of earthquake loading, flood-induced scour, and hydrodynamic forces create a critical multi-hazard scenario. This research develops a comprehensive multi-hazard analysis framework to evaluate bridge performance under combined seismic and flood-induced hazards. Three-dimensional finite element (FE) models of representative three- and six-span steel girder bridges are developed and analyzed under varying scour depths and hydrodynamic loading conditions. Modal analysis, static pushover analysis, and non-linear time history analysis are conducted using ground motions representative of catastrophic events in the New Madrid Seismic Zone (NMSZ). The multi-hazard analysis methodology is also applied to a real 11-span bridge in northern Mississippi to assess its performance under region-specific flood and earthquake scenarios.

This study investigates the seismic vulnerability of bridges under the combined effects of earthquake loading, flood-induced scour, and hydrodynamic effects. The analysis reveals that scour significantly affects the fundamental periods, stiffness, displacement ductility, and structural capacity of the bridges. Under combined hazard conditions, moment demands, lateral displacements, and foundation vulnerabilities increase, with shallow scour depths that substantially compromise foundation stability during seismic events. The hydrodynamic effects become critical at deeper scour depths, at which the moment demand increases by up to 25%. These results highlight the importance of accounting for hydrodynamic forces in seismic risk assessments, particularly for bridges exposed to deeply scoured foundations and high-water regions. Fragility curves are developed for a real bridge, using displacement ductility as the engineering demand parameter for varying scour conditions. The results indicate that the scour substantially affects the seismic fragility of the bridge. As the depth of the scour increases, the probability of exceeding all damage states increases significantly, highlighting the critical need to consider the effects of the scour in seismic risk assessments for bridges in flood- and earthquake-prone regions. The multi-hazard framework in this study provides a practical analysis framework for evaluating bridge vulnerability under combined earthquake and flood scenarios, thereby contributing to the design and maintenance of more resilient bridge infrastructure. These findings emphasize the importance of implementing scour countermeasures and incorporating multi-hazard considerations into bridge design and maintenance strategies.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.