Faculty and Student Publications

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

10-10-2019

Abstract

© 2019 The Authors We investigate the implications of the latest LHCb measurement of RK for NP explanations of the B anomalies. The previous data could be explained if the b→sμ+μ− NP is in (I) C9,NPμμ or (II) C9,NPμμ=−C10,NPμμ, with scenario (I) providing a better explanation than scenario (II). This continues to hold with the new measurement of RK. However, for both scenarios, this measurement leads to a slight tension of O(1σ) between separate fits to the b→sμ+μ− and RK(⁎) data. In this paper, we investigate whether this tension can be alleviated with the addition of NP in b→se+e−. In particular, we examine the effect of adding such NP to scenarios (I) and (II). We find several scenarios in which this leads to improvements in the fits. Z′ and LQ models with contributions to both b→sμ+μ− and b→se+e− can reproduce the data, but only within scenarios based on (II). If the tension persists in future measurements, it may be necessary to consider NP models with more than one particle contributing to b→sℓ+ℓ−.

Relational Format

journal article

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.