• Home
  • Search
  • Browse Collections
  • My Account
  • About
  • DC Network Digital Commons Network™
Skip to main content
eGrove University of Mississippi
  • Home
  • About
  • FAQ
  • My Account

Home > Library > Digital Collections > Archival Digital Accounting Collection > Deloitte Collection > Proceedings from Kansas Symposium

Proceedings of the University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems
 

Proceedings of the University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems

The Deloitte/University of Kansas Auditing Symposium has been held on a bi-annual basis since 1972. Its purpose is to provide a forum where practitioners, regulators, and academics can come together and have open discussions about the auditing profession from each of their unique perspectives. It is seen as a greatly beneficial event for practitioners, regulators, and academics alike. Information about current symposia can be found at the University of Kansas School of Business.

Printing is not supported at the primary Gallery Thumbnail page. Please first navigate to a specific Image before printing.

Follow

Switch View to Grid View Slideshow
 
  • Is the second standard of fieldwork necessary by Thomas P. Bintinger

    Is the second standard of fieldwork necessary

    Thomas P. Bintinger

  • Discussant's response to "An assertion-based approach to auditing" by William L. Felix

    Discussant's response to "An assertion-based approach to auditing"

    William L. Felix

  • Discussant's response to "'Under the spreading chestnut tree,' accountants' legal liability -- A historical perspective" by Thomas A. Gavin

    Discussant's response to "'Under the spreading chestnut tree,' accountants' legal liability -- A historical perspective"

    Thomas A. Gavin

  • Impact of technological events and trends on audit evidence in the year 2000: Phase I by Gary L. Holstrum, Theodore J. Mock, and Robert N. West

    Impact of technological events and trends on audit evidence in the year 2000: Phase I

    Gary L. Holstrum, Theodore J. Mock, and Robert N. West

  • Interim report on the development of an expert system for the auditor's loan loss evaluation by Kirk P. Kelly, Gary S. Ribar, and John J. Willingham

    Interim report on the development of an expert system for the auditor's loan loss evaluation

    Kirk P. Kelly, Gary S. Ribar, and John J. Willingham

  • Assertion based approach to auditing by Donald A. Leslie, Stephen J. Aldersley, Donald J. Cockburn, and Carolyn J. Reiter

    Assertion based approach to auditing

    Donald A. Leslie, Stephen J. Aldersley, Donald J. Cockburn, and Carolyn J. Reiter

  • Work of the Special Investigations Committee by R. K. Mautz

    Work of the Special Investigations Committee

    R. K. Mautz

  • Discussant's response to "Interim report on the development of an expert system for the auditor's loan loss evaluation" by William F. Messier

    Discussant's response to "Interim report on the development of an expert system for the auditor's loan loss evaluation"

    William F. Messier

  • Unresolved issues in classical audit sample evaluations by Donald R. Nichols, Rajendra P. Srivastava, and Bart H. Ward

    Unresolved issues in classical audit sample evaluations

    Donald R. Nichols, Rajendra P. Srivastava, and Bart H. Ward

  • Discussant's response to "On the economics of product differentiation in auditing" by Howard R. Osharow

    Discussant's response to "On the economics of product differentiation in auditing"

    Howard R. Osharow

  • Under the spreading chestnut tree, accountants' legal liability -- A historical perspective by Paul J. Ostling

    Under the spreading chestnut tree, accountants' legal liability -- A historical perspective

    Paul J. Ostling

  • On the economics of product differentiation in Auditing by Dan A. Simunic and Michael Stein

    On the economics of product differentiation in Auditing

    Dan A. Simunic and Michael Stein

  • Discussant's Response to "Impact of technological events and trends on audit evidence in the year 2000: Phase I" by Rajendra P. Srivastava and N. Allen Ford

    Discussant's Response to "Impact of technological events and trends on audit evidence in the year 2000: Phase I"

    Rajendra P. Srivastava and N. Allen Ford

  • Auditing Symposium VIII: Proceedings of the 1986 Touche Ross/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems by University of Kansas, School of Business; Rajendra P. Srivastava; and N. Allen Ford

    Auditing Symposium VIII: Proceedings of the 1986 Touche Ross/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems

    University of Kansas, School of Business; Rajendra P. Srivastava; and N. Allen Ford

    Discussant's response to On the economics of product differentiation in auditing / Howard R. Osharow; Unresolved issues in classical audit sample evaluations / Donald R. Nichols, Rajendra P. Srivastava, Bart H. Ward; Discussant's response to Unresolved issues in classical audit sample evaluations / Abraham D. Akresh; Under the spreading chestnut tree, accountants' legal liability -- A historical perspective / Paul J. Ostling; Impact of technological events and trends on audit evidence in the year 2000: Phase I / Gary L. Holstrum, Theodore J. Mock, Robert N. West; Discussant's Response to Impact of technological events and trends on audit evidence in the year 2000: Phase I; Is the second standard of fieldwork necessary / Thomas P. Bintinger; Discussant's response to Is the second standard of fieldwork necessary / Andrew D. Bailey; Interim report on the development of an expert system for the auditor's loan loss evaluation / Kirk P. Kelly, Gary S. Ribar, John J. Willingham; Discussant's response to Interim report on the development of an expert system for the auditor's loan loss evaluation / William F. Messier; Work of the Special Investigations Committee / R. K. (Robert Kuhn) Mautz (1915-2002); Discussant's response to Under the spreading chestnut tree, accountants' legal liability -- A historical perspective / Thomas A. Gavin; Assertion based approach to auditing / Donald A. Leslie; Discussant's response to An assertion-based approach to auditing / William L. Felix

  • Discussant's response to auditor reviews of changing prices disclosures by Robert W. Berliner

    Discussant's response to auditor reviews of changing prices disclosures

    Robert W. Berliner

  • Discussant's response to let's change GAAS!!! ???*&#@ by William L. Felix

    Discussant's response to let's change GAAS!!! ???*&#@

    William L. Felix

  • Discussant's response to current developments in United Kingdom Auditing research by John H. Fitzgibbon

    Discussant's response to current developments in United Kingdom Auditing research

    John H. Fitzgibbon

  • Current developments in United Kingdom auditing research by David R. Gwillam

    Current developments in United Kingdom auditing research

    David R. Gwillam

  • Discussant's response to the case for the structured audit approach by Gary L. Holstrum

    Discussant's response to the case for the structured audit approach

    Gary L. Holstrum

  • Discussant's response to the origins and development of materiality as an auditing concept by Lauren Kelly

    Discussant's response to the origins and development of materiality as an auditing concept

    Lauren Kelly

  • Discussant's response to an analysis of the audit framework focusing on inherent risk and the role of statistical sampling in compliance testing by William R. Kinney

    Discussant's response to an analysis of the audit framework focusing on inherent risk and the role of statistical sampling in compliance testing

    William R. Kinney

  • Analysis of the audit framework focusing on inherent risk and the role of statistical sampling in compliance testing by Donald A. Leslie

    Analysis of the audit framework focusing on inherent risk and the role of statistical sampling in compliance testing

    Donald A. Leslie

  • Self-regulation: How it works by R. K. Mautz

    Self-regulation: How it works

    R. K. Mautz

  • Let's change GAAS!!! ???*&#@ by Robert Mednick and Alan J. Winters

    Let's change GAAS!!! ???*&#@

    Robert Mednick and Alan J. Winters

  • Case for the structured audit by John Mullarkey

    Case for the structured audit

    John Mullarkey

 

Page 5 of 10

  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
 
 

Browse

  • Collections
  • Disciplines
  • Authors

Search

Advanced Search

  • Notify me via email or RSS

Author Corner

  • Author FAQ

Additional Information

  • Request an Accessible Copy
 
Elsevier - Digital Commons

Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement

Privacy Copyright