Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Date of Award

8-1-2022

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

M.A. in Southern Studies

First Advisor

Jodi Skipper

Second Advisor

Catarina Passidomo

Third Advisor

Ted Ownby

School

University of Mississippi

Relational Format

dissertation/thesis

Abstract

This thesis examines the viability of southern studies, a regional studies project on the study of the U.S. South, as an academic field of study and institutionalized site of multi-, inter-, and transdisciplinary knowledge production. Southern studies has undergone numerous turns and paradigm shifts since its institutionalization in the 1970s. These ontological, epistemological, and methodological developments have reoriented the objectives of interdisciplinary knowledge production. Despite the present permeability of disciplinary boundaries, the institutional structure and its racial, capitalist, and disciplinary hierarchies hinder communication and collaboration across disciplines and fields and between the “ivory tower” and “real world.” Understanding the impact of this structure is fundamental to recognizing the deficiencies of interdisciplinarity in southern studies and its ambiguity as a distinct interdisciplinary field. The relative absence of recent critical introspection by established stakeholders in the field suggests a problematic complacency by scholars studying the U.S. South. A brief glimpse at the daily news or engagement with critical interdisciplinary discourses clarify the need for new knowledge beyond disciplines—specifically on the South. Through examination of a range of primary and secondary source materials pertaining to southern studies and interdisciplinary fields more broadly, I address southern studies’ past, present, and possible futures as an interdisciplinary project. These sources—including academic publications, program reports and overviews, news articles, online forums, and social media posts—inform southern studies’ successes and failures in mobilizing cross-disciplinary and cross-field bridging and in producing new forms of knowledge. Border crossings implicate an “in-between” space, characterized by a critical relationship to the institutional structure. I argue that the development of a fluid, yet grounded southern studies framework is contingent on the field’s critical position within the institutional structure. “In-between” space foregrounds inclusivity and equality, the bridging necessary for innovation and growth, and a mediation of tensions (e.g., the theory/practice divide). It complicates taken-for-granted dichotomies and empowers scholars/professors, students, institutionalized sites, and the public as equal stakeholders in the South. Ultimately, I propose a transdisciplinary field wherein southern studies is an academic space, educational pursuit, and social force.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.