Honors Theses
Date of Award
Spring 5-8-2026
Document Type
Undergraduate Thesis
Department
Croft Institute for International Studies
First Advisor
Katherine Centellas
Second Advisor
Nora Sylvander
Third Advisor
Ian Gowan
Relational Format
Dissertation/Thesis
Abstract
This thesis examines why Bolivia’s 2009 plurinational constitution—despite its strong recognition of Indigenous autonomy, collective territory, and prior consultation—often produces rights that remain “en papel” rather than in practice. Based on one month of fieldwork in Tumupasa, Chojasivi, La Paz, El Alto, and Santa Cruz, the study draws on interviews, participant observation, and NGO documents to analyze the structural barriers that prevent constitutional guarantees from becoming enforceable governance tools. This gap between recognition and implementation structures the central research question: why do Bolivia’s constitutional and legal protections for indigenous land and resource rights function as symbolic guarantees rather than enforceable governance tools? Using these fieldwork findings, this study analyzes the perceived policy failures of indigenous peoples through the lenses of four core concepts: buen vivir, autonomy, plurinationalism, and territory vs. property. These findings contribute to broader debates on constitutional multiculturalism, indigenous autonomy, and the structural limits of plurinationalism in Latin America.
Recommended Citation
Purcell, Andrew F., ""En Papel,” Not in Practice: Indigenous Autonomy and the Structural Barriers to Land and Resource Control in Bolivia" (2026). Honors Theses. 3458.
https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/3458
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Included in
Latin American Languages and Societies Commons, Spanish and Portuguese Language and Literature Commons