• Home
  • Search
  • Browse Collections
  • My Account
  • About
  • DC Network Digital Commons Network™
Skip to main content
eGrove University of Mississippi
  • Home
  • About
  • FAQ
  • My Account

Home > Library > Digital Collections > Archival Digital Accounting Collection > Deloitte Collection > Proceedings from Kansas Symposium

Proceedings of the University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems
 

Proceedings of the University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems

The Deloitte/University of Kansas Auditing Symposium has been held on a bi-annual basis since 1972. Its purpose is to provide a forum where practitioners, regulators, and academics can come together and have open discussions about the auditing profession from each of their unique perspectives. It is seen as a greatly beneficial event for practitioners, regulators, and academics alike. Information about current symposia can be found at the University of Kansas School of Business.

Printing is not supported at the primary Gallery Thumbnail page. Please first navigate to a specific Image before printing.

Follow

Switch View to Grid View Slideshow
 
  • Relationship of auditing standards to detection of fraud by George R. Catlett

    Relationship of auditing standards to detection of fraud

    George R. Catlett

  • Decision theory view of auditing by William L. Felix

    Decision theory view of auditing

    William L. Felix

  • New AICPA Audit Commission -- Will the real questions please stand up? by Stephen D. Harlan

    New AICPA Audit Commission -- Will the real questions please stand up?

    Stephen D. Harlan

  • Discussant's response to auditor independence: Its historical development and some proposals for research by Le Roy E. Kist

    Discussant's response to auditor independence: Its historical development and some proposals for research

    Le Roy E. Kist

  • Discussant's response to a decision theory view of auditing by James Loebbecke

    Discussant's response to a decision theory view of auditing

    James Loebbecke

  • Controlling audit quality: A responsibility of the profession? by Andrew P. Marincovich

    Controlling audit quality: A responsibility of the profession?

    Andrew P. Marincovich

  • Discussant's response to controlling audit quality: A responsibility of the profession? by Gordon L. Murray

    Discussant's response to controlling audit quality: A responsibility of the profession?

    Gordon L. Murray

  • Discussant's response to the new AICPA Audit Commission -- Will the real questions please stand up? by Jack C. Robertson

    Discussant's response to the new AICPA Audit Commission -- Will the real questions please stand up?

    Jack C. Robertson

  • Contemporary auditing problems: Proceedings of the Touche Ross/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems by University of Kansas, School of Business and Howard Stettler

    Contemporary auditing problems: Proceedings of the Touche Ross/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems

    University of Kansas, School of Business and Howard Stettler

    Discussant's response to the sample of one: Indispensable or indefensible? / Alvin A. Arens; Auditor independence: Its Historical development and some proposals for research / R. Glen Berryman; Case for continuation of mandatory independent audits for publicly held companies / John C. Burton; Discussant's response to auditor independence: Its historical development and some proposals for research / Le Roy E. Kist; New AICPA Audit Commission -- Will the real questions please stand up? / Stephen D. Harlan; Discussant's response to the new AICPA Audit Commission -- Will the real questions please stand up? / Jack C. Robertson; Controlling audit quality: A responsibility of the profession? / Andrew P. Marincovich; Discussant's response to controlling audit quality: A responsibility of the profession? / Gordon L. Murray; Relationship of auditing standards to detection of fraud / George R. Catlett; Discussant's response to relationship of auditing standards to detection of fraud / John J. Willingham; Decision theory view of auditing / William L. Felix; Discussant's response to a decision theory view of auditing / James Loebbecke; Setting standards for statistical sampling in auditing / John C. Broderick; Discussant's response to setting standards for statistical sampling in auditing / Lawrence L. Vance; Sample of one: Indispensable or indefensible? / Gregory M. Boni

  • Discussant's response to setting standards for statistical sampling in auditing by Lawrence L. Vance

    Discussant's response to setting standards for statistical sampling in auditing

    Lawrence L. Vance

  • Discussant's response to relationship of auditing standards to detection of fraud by John J. Willingham

    Discussant's response to relationship of auditing standards to detection of fraud

    John J. Willingham

  • Discussant's response to some historical auditing milestones; An epistemology of an inexact art by Horace G. Barden

    Discussant's response to some historical auditing milestones; An epistemology of an inexact art

    Horace G. Barden

  • Future extensions of audit services, Meeting investors' future needs by Donald J. Bevis

    Future extensions of audit services, Meeting investors' future needs

    Donald J. Bevis

  • Some historical auditing milestones: An epistemology of an inexact art by R. Gene Brown and Roger H. Salquist

    Some historical auditing milestones: An epistemology of an inexact art

    R. Gene Brown and Roger H. Salquist

  • Discussant's response to future extensions of audit services, meeting investors' future needs by John C. Burton

    Discussant's response to future extensions of audit services, meeting investors' future needs

    John C. Burton

  • Future directions of auditing research by Douglas R. Carmichael

    Future directions of auditing research

    Douglas R. Carmichael

  • Discussant's response to toward a philosophy of auditing by Henry P. Hill

    Discussant's response to toward a philosophy of auditing

    Henry P. Hill

  • Toward standards for materiality(?) by William Holmes

    Toward standards for materiality(?)

    William Holmes

  • Discussant's response to toward standards for statistical sampling by James W. Kelley

    Discussant's response to toward standards for statistical sampling

    James W. Kelley

  • Toward a philosophy of auditing by R. K. Mautz

    Toward a philosophy of auditing

    R. K. Mautz

  • Discussant's response to future directions for auditing research by Frederick L. Neumann

    Discussant's response to future directions for auditing research

    Frederick L. Neumann

  • What are the courts saying to auditors? by A. A. Sommer

    What are the courts saying to auditors?

    A. A. Sommer

  • Problem with auditing is... (The stuff dreams are made of) by Marvin L. Stone

    Problem with auditing is... (The stuff dreams are made of)

    Marvin L. Stone

  • Towards standards for statistical sampling by Kenneth W. Stringer

    Towards standards for statistical sampling

    Kenneth W. Stringer

  • Discussant's response to what are the courts saying to auditors? by Russell A. Taussig

    Discussant's response to what are the courts saying to auditors?

    Russell A. Taussig

 

Page 9 of 10

  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
 
 

Browse

  • Collections
  • Disciplines
  • Authors

Search

Advanced Search

  • Notify me via email or RSS

Author Corner

  • Author FAQ

Additional Information

  • Request an Accessible Copy
 
Elsevier - Digital Commons

Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement

Privacy Copyright